Errors in CLAT 2025 Provisional Answer Key, Candidates Raise Objections in Supreme Court

The Consortium of National Law Universities (CNLUs) successfully held the CLAT 2025 exam on December 01, 2024. Acting promptly, the Consortium released the preliminary answer key for CLAT 2025 on December 02, 2024. After the release of the provisional answer key, students found many mistakes in it. Several errors in CLAT 2025 provisional answer key raised concerns among the candidates, leading to anxiety and commotion. Due to this grave issue, students have moved to the Supreme Court to raise objection against it.

Errors in CLAT 2025 Provisional Answer Key

Aspirants have expressed dissatisfaction with the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2025, with both students and coaching centers voicing complaints about the testing procedure. The accuracy of the provisional answer key released by the Consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) has also been questioned. The answer key challenge process has also been questioned by the candidates due to the exorbitantly high fees kept for challenging any answer.

Candidates Move Supreme Court to Challenge Answer Key

Two law students have submitted a petition to the Supreme Court contesting the provisional answer key issued by the Consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs). The candidates are requesting a halt to the release of the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2025 results and the subsequent counselling procedure. The exam took place at various centres on December 1.

The aspirants have also expressed concerns regarding the examination process and reported unfair treatment of candidates during the exam. The tentative answer key, which serves as the foundation for ranking and assessing individual performance, has been a major source of dispute among applicants. Students and several coaching centers have pointed out inconsistencies in the preliminary answer key.

Objections Against Errors in CLAT 2025 Provisional Answer Key

In their case, the two petitioners – Ayush Agarwal from Indore and Anam Khan from Raipur, who took the exam at Government Law College in Mumbai – argued that the tentative answer key had a few wrong answers, indicating carelessness that would affect their rankings and merit. The petitioners are being represented in the Supreme Court by advocate Manasi Bhushan. The hearing is scheduled for December 9.

Errors in CLAT 2025 Provisional Answer Key: What Does Petition Says

The petitioners raised concerns regarding procedural irregularities and inconsistent treatment of candidates during the examination, claiming it infringes upon the right to equality under Article 14 and the right to education as per Article 21A of the Constitution of India. According to the petitioners, while Khan was given the question booklet and the OMR sheet at 1:50 pm as per the regulations, Agarwal received his materials at 2:00 pm, resulting in him having less time to complete the exam.

At 1:50 pm, Khan received the question booklet and the OMR sheet, while Agarwal followed the regulations and got the materials at 2 pm, leading to a reduced exam duration. In their plea, the petitioners have asked for a hold on the results and the start of the counselling process until the final answer key is issued without any errors. The Consortium has released the CLAT 2025 final answer key and results on December 08, 2024.

Students Complain of High Costs and Low Returns

Among India’s competitive exams, the CLAT 2025 undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate (PG) registration fees are among the highest. In order to contest mistakes in the provisional answer key, CLAT applicants must now pay an extra ₹1,000 each objection. The objection fee will be reimbursed if the objection is determined to be legitimate or upheld, which is the only way to offset the exorbitant cost.

The candidates asserted that the deadline given for submitting objections was arbitrary, and that the fees associated were excessive and unjust, especially since the mistakes resulted from the Consortium’s oversight. There are 26 universities that are members of the Consortium. As per the petitioner, there were errors in 12 questions, leading to a total objection fees of Rs.12,000. This objection fees is unacceptable, specially since the errors arose due to the Consortium’s negligence.

Inconsistencies in CLAT 2025 Paper

As per the top law expert, numerous questions in the exam did not align with the syllabus or sample papers issued by the Consortium. While most sections were manageable for the candidates, they identified 12 errors in the answer key. This year, the Consortium provided only two sample papers, which was perceived as inconsistent with the syllabus and examination guidelines provided.

With 24 reading passages, many students described the PG paper as lengthy. The expert noted that this serves as merely a provisional key, and mistakes are anticipated each year. The CLAT PG answer key contained about 10 to 12 errors. Several questions featured ambiguous options and could potentially have more than one correct answer. The Consortium has not released any sample paper for CLAT PG 2025 candidates.

Sharing is caring!