Home   »   LGBTQ Persons Against their Identity

Counselling to Turn LGBTQ Persons Against their Identity

The Supreme Court of India warned against using court-ordered counseling to change LGBTQ+ individuals’ identities, emphasizing respect for their choices and the significance of their chosen families.

Relevance: GS I (Social Issues)

Background

  • The Supreme Court warned against using court-ordered counseling to change the identities and sexual orientations of LGBTQ community members.
  • A three-judge bench led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud emphasized the importance of respecting an individual’s identity and sexual orientation without trying to alter it through counseling.
  • The Chief Justice stressed that judges should avoid imposing their values over constitutional protections.
  • The verdict provided guidelines for handling habeas corpus petitions and protection pleas by LGBTQ+ individuals, urging judges to demonstrate empathy and disregard social biases.
  • The case arose from a petition by a Kerala woman concerning her same-sex partner, where the Kerala High Court had ordered counseling leading to the partner choosing to stay with her parents.
  • The Supreme Court did not intervene in specific cases but addressed broader concerns regarding the potential misuse of counseling to pressure LGBTQ+ individuals against their will.
  • Chief Justice Chandrachud highlighted the importance of recognizing chosen families, especially for LGBTQ individuals facing discrimination or violence from their birth families.

History of Recognition of LGBTQIA+ in India

  • 1861: British introduction of Section 377 to the Indian Penal Code, criminalizing “unnatural offenses.”
  • 1977: Shakuntala Devi’s publication “The World of Homosexuals,” the first study of homosexuality in India.
  • 1994: Legal recognition of the third gender with voting rights.
  • 2014: The Supreme Court of India recognizes transgender people as a third gender.
  • 2017: Supreme Court’s affirmation of the Right to Privacy, safeguarding LGBTQIA+ individuals’ sexual orientation.
  • 6 September 2018: Decriminalization of consensual homosexual activities by repealing parts of Section 377.
  • 2019: Introduction of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, focusing on rights and welfare.

Challenges Faced by the LGBTQIA+ Community in India

  • Social Discrimination: Prevalence in employment, housing, and healthcare sectors leading to potential poverty and insecurity.
  • Lack of Representation: Minimal presence in media, politics, and governance, hindering voice and needs recognition.
  • Mental Health Issues: High susceptibility to hate crimes, and verbal and physical abuse, contributing to mental health struggles.
  • Rural LGBTQIA+ Silence: Limited exposure and connectivity, leading to suppressed identities and exacerbated abuse.
  • Homelessness: High rates among LGBTQIA+ youth due to familial rejection, leading to missed education and increased risk behaviors.

Way Forward

  • Supportive Policies and Laws: Development and implementation of protective laws against discrimination, hate crimes, and violence.
  • Promoting Inclusive Parenting: Encouraging acceptance and understanding within families to foster societal inclusivity.
  • Fostering Diversity and Pride: Creation and promotion of open forums and platforms for LGBTQIA+ youth, celebrating diversity through initiatives like Pride Month and Pride Parades.

Advocating for Equality: Recognizing and treating LGBTQIA+ individuals as equals, emphasizing that sexual orientation is a natural aspect of human diversity.

Sharing is caring!

Counselling to Turn LGBTQ Persons Against their Identity_3.1

FAQs

What was the recent warning from the Supreme Court regarding LGBTQ+ individuals' identities?

The Supreme Court cautioned against using court-ordered counseling to change the identities and sexual orientations of LGBTQ community members. Emphasizing respect for their choices, the court highlighted the significance of chosen families.

What prompted this warning from the Supreme Court?

The warning stemmed from a case involving a Kerala woman and her same-sex partner, where the Kerala High Court had ordered counseling. The Supreme Court addressed broader concerns regarding the misuse of counseling to pressure LGBTQ+ individuals against their will.

What guidelines did the Supreme Court provide in this regard?

The court urged judges to demonstrate empathy and disregard social biases when handling habeas corpus petitions and protection pleas by LGBTQ+ individuals. It emphasized respecting constitutional protections and avoiding the imposition of personal values.

About the Author
Nikesh
Nikesh
Author

Hey there! I'm Nikesh, a content writer at Adda247. I specialize in creating informative content focused on UPSC and State PSC exams. Join me as we unravel the complexities of these exams and turn aspirations into achievements together!