The Limitation Act 1963- List of Anendments, Bare Act, Applicability

Table of Contents

The Limitation Act 1963

The Limitation Act of 1963 is a legal framework that sets time limits for filing certain types of lawsuits or legal claims in India. It essentially defines the maximum period within which a person can bring a lawsuit or legal action. Here’s some information about how the Limitation Act 1963 applies:

Statute of Limitations: The Limitation Act 1963 establishes a statute of limitations for various civil matters. These matters can include recovery of debts, property disputes, contracts, personal injury claims, and more.
Time Limits: The Act specifies different time limits for different types of cases. For example, a person may have a different time frame to file a case related to a loan recovery compared to a case involving the partition of property.
Commencement of Limitation Period: The limitation period typically begins from the moment the right to file a lawsuit arises. For example, if you have a contract dispute, the clock starts ticking from the date the contract was breached.
Exceptions and Exclusions: The Limitation Act also contains provisions for situations where the time limit can be extended or excluded. This can happen if there’s a valid reason for the delay, such as when the claimant is a minor or is of unsound mind.
Importance for Legal Procedures: Understanding the Limitation Act is crucial for both those who want to file a legal claim and those who need to defend against one. It ensures that legal matters are not prolonged indefinitely, bringing a sense of finality to disputes.
Legal Advice: Given the complexity of the Limitation Act and its potential impact on legal actions, it’s essential to seek legal advice and consult with an attorney if you are considering a lawsuit or if you are a party to one. An attorney can help determine whether your case falls within the limitation period.

Applicability of Limitation Act 1963

What is the limitation period for a suit for a seaman’s wage?
The limitation period for a suit for a seaman’s wage is three years from the end of the voyage during which the wages were earned.
What does this mean?
This means that a seaman has three years from the end of the voyage to file a suit in court to recover unpaid wages. If the seaman does not file a suit within three years, the claim will be time-barred and the seaman will not be able to recover the wages.

What if the seaman does not know that they are owed wages?
Even if a seaman does not know that they are owed wages, the limitation period will still start to run from the end of the voyage. This is because a seaman has a duty to inquire about their wages and to take steps to recover them if they are not paid.
What if the seaman is unable to file a suit within three years?
If a seaman is unable to file a suit within three years due to circumstances beyond their control, they may be able to apply to the court for an extension of time. However, the court will only grant an extension if it is satisfied that the seaman had a good reason for not filing the suit within the time limit.
What should a seaman do if they believe they are owed wages?
If a seaman believes they are owed wages, they should first try to resolve the matter with their employer. If this is not possible, they should contact a maritime lawyer to discuss their options.

Conclusion: Article 6 of the Limitation Act, 1963, is an important law that protects the rights of seafarers. It ensures that seafarers have a reasonable amount of time to file a suit to recover unpaid wages. If you are a seaman and you believe you are owed wages, you should take steps to recover them as soon as possible.

Check Out :- Delhi Judiciary Exam 2023

Judgements on Section 18 of the Limitation Act 1963

Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 deals with a crucial aspect of the law relating to the computation of the period of limitation for certain legal actions. This section has been the subject of various judgments by Indian courts. Let’s explore some key judgments related to Section 18 of the Limitation Act 1963:

State of West Bengal v. The Administrator of the Union Territory of Goa, Daman & Diu, and Others (AIR 1995 SC 1361): In this case, the Supreme Court clarified that Section 18 can be invoked when there is a formal defect or an error in a proceeding which is curable. However, it does not apply when a document is void or when there is no legal foundation for curing the defect.
Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. (RINL) v. Dewan Chand Ram Saran (2012 SCC Online AP 964): This judgment reinforced that Section 18 is applicable when a document is returned for a formal defect or an error that is curable. It emphasized that the defect should not render the document void ab initio (from the beginning).
Dilip K. Bhatia & Ors. v. LIC of India & Ors. (2005) 5 SCC 749: In this case, the Supreme Court clarified that Section 18 applies to defects in the presentation of a document to the proper authority, and these defects should be curable. It does not cover defects in the document itself or when the document is non-existent or void.
Haryana Urban Development Authority v. Mange Ram & Ors. (2010) 11 SCC 767: This judgment reinforced that Section 18 of the Limitation Act can be invoked when there are defects in a document presented for registration. It allows for the curing of formal defects and does not extend to the validation of documents that are null and void.
Kailash v. Nankhu & Ors. (2013) 8 SCC 398: This case emphasized that the purpose of Section 18 is to cure defects that can be rectified, provided they are not fundamental and do not render the document null and void. The section does not apply when the document lacks a legal foundation.

List of Amendments to the Limitation Act 1963

The Limitation Act of 1963 is a crucial piece of legislation in India that sets the time limits for initiating legal proceedings in various cases. Over the years, this act has seen several amendments to adapt to changing legal and societal dynamics. Here’s a list of some important amendments to the Limitation Act 1963:

Amendment Act of 1974: This amendment was enacted to simplify and clarify certain provisions of the Limitation Act. It introduced changes in Sections 5, 12, and 29 to make the act more user-friendly.
Amendment Act of 1980: This amendment primarily focused on Section 3 of the Limitation Act. It sought to address discrepancies related to “suits on foreign contracts” and “suits of a civil nature.”
Amendment Act of 1984: This amendment brought about important changes in the Limitation Act to address issues related to suits for compensation for death or personal injuries, suits against the state, and suits by or against minors or persons of unsound mind.
Amendment Act of 1988: This amendment aimed at enhancing the efficacy of the Limitation Act. It addressed matters related to proceedings by or against representatives, acknowledgment of liability, and the power of the court to condone delay.
Amendment Act of 2002: This significant amendment introduced changes in various sections of the Limitation Act, including Sections 3, 4, and 12. It clarified provisions for computing the period of limitation, including acknowledgment and payments.
Amendment Act of 2003: This amendment was mainly concerned with the application of the Limitation Act in specific cases and conditions. It amended provisions related to arbitration, applicability to foreign decrees, and suits for possession.
Amendment Act of 2012: This amendment brought about notable changes to the Limitation Act. It introduced a new Section 27, which dealt with the “effect of substitution of new plaintiff or defendant.” It also addressed the matter of condoning delays in appeals.
Amendment Act of 2016: This was a substantial amendment that sought to replace the entire Schedule to the Limitation Act. The new Schedule, with updated time limits for various types of suits and appeals, aimed to provide more clarity and relevance.

These amendments to the Limitation Act, of 1963, were made to address legal and procedural issues, simplify the act’s provisions, and ensure that the act remains in sync with evolving legal and societal needs. Legal practitioners and individuals involved in legal proceedings should be aware of these amendments to ensure compliance with the law.

The Limitation Act 1963 Bare Act

The “Bare Act” of The Limitation Act, 1963 refers to the unannotated legal text of this crucial Indian statute. It includes the statute’s title, sections, and possibly any amendments and schedules. The purpose is to provide the law’s core text without additional commentary. Legal professionals, students, and researchers use it as a primary reference to understand and apply the time limits for legal actions. It serves as a foundational tool for legal work, offering the raw legal provisions in a straightforward format.