Tribunal Definition, Meaning, Function and Disputes

Tribunals: Tribunals play a crucial role in the legal system, providing an alternative mechanism for resolving disputes outside of traditional courts. This article explores the definition, meaning, function, and disputes handled by tribunals. Tribunals are specialized bodies set up by the government to resolve specific types of disputes or issues. They are designed to be more accessible, efficient, and less formal than regular courts.

The functions of tribunals vary, but they typically include making administrative decisions, settling disputes between individuals or organizations, and interpreting and applying specific laws or regulations. Tribunals handle a wide range of disputes, including employment matters, tax appeals, immigration cases, planning and environmental issues, and social security claims. Their decisions are binding and can be subject to further review or appeal in higher courts.

Definition of Tribunals

A tribunal is an institution with quasi-judicial powers that is established to address various issues such as administrative or tax-related disputes. It serves multiple functions, including the resolution of disputes, determination of rights between parties, making administrative decisions, reviewing existing decisions, and more.

The term “tribunal” finds its origins in the word “tribunes,” which referred to the magistrates of the Classical Roman Republic. These tribunes were responsible for safeguarding citizens from arbitrary actions by the aristocratic magistrates. In a broader sense, a tribunal can encompass any individual or entity authorized to judge, adjudicate, or resolve claims and disputes, regardless of whether it bears the specific title of “tribunal.”

Tribunals as Per Indian Constitution

The concept of tribunals was not originally part of the Indian Constitution but was incorporated through the 42nd Amendment Act of 1976. The Indian Constitution addresses tribunals through two distinct articles: Article 323-A and Article 323-B.

• Article 323-A specifically deals with Administrative Tribunals, focusing on matters related to public services. These tribunals can only be established by the Parliament and aim to adjudicate disputes in areas such as taxation, foreign exchange, industrial and labor issues, land reforms, elections, and more.
• On the other hand, Article 323-B pertains to tribunals for other matters beyond public services. It provides authority to both the Parliament and state legislatures to establish tribunals for specific areas falling within their legislative competence, including taxation, industrial disputes, rent and tenancy rights, and more.

There are key differences between Articles 323-A and 323-B:

• Article 323-A focuses solely on public service matters, while Article 323-B extends to various other subject areas.
• Additionally, tribunals under Article 323-A can only be established by the Parliament, whereas tribunals under Article 323-B can be established by both the Parliament and state legislatures.
• Furthermore, Article 323-A allows for the establishment of a single tribunal for the Centre and each state or multiple states, while Article 323-B permits the creation of a hierarchical structure of tribunals.

Different Kinds of Tribunals

The Indian legal system encompasses various kinds of tribunals to address specific areas of law and administration. These tribunals are specialized quasi-judicial bodies with expertise in their respective domains. Here are some of the different kinds of tribunals under the Indian legal system:

1. Administrative Tribunals: These tribunals are established under Article 323-A of the Indian Constitution and deal with disputes related to public services, including matters concerning recruitment, service conditions, promotions, and disciplinary actions of government employees.
2. Tax Tribunals: Tax tribunals, such as the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), handle appeals and disputes pertaining to direct and indirect taxes.
3. Consumer Dispute Redressal Forums: These tribunals, at various levels, are established under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, to resolve disputes between consumers and sellers/service providers regarding defective goods, deficient services, unfair trade practices, and other consumer-related issues.
4. Company Law Tribunals: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) deal with matters related to corporate law, including company mergers, liquidations, insolvency proceedings, and disputes among stakeholders.
5. Environmental Tribunals: Environmental tribunals, such as the National Green Tribunal (NGT), focus on resolving disputes and enforcing laws related to environmental protection, conservation, and pollution control.
6. Intellectual Property Appellate Board: The Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) handles appeals and disputes concerning intellectual property rights, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, and geographical indications.
7. Armed Forces Tribunals: These tribunals provide a judicial forum to address service-related matters and disputes within the armed forces, including promotions, postings, disciplinary actions, and pension matters.

These are just a few examples of the diverse range of tribunals established under the Indian legal system. Each tribunal operates within its specific legal framework and has jurisdiction over its designated areas, aiming to provide efficient and specialized resolution of disputes.

Functions of Tribunals

Tribunals play a crucial role in the Indian legal system and serve various functions. Here are some of the key functions performed by tribunals:

1. Adjudication: One of the primary functions of tribunals is to adjudicate disputes and render decisions. They have the authority to hear and determine cases within their respective jurisdictions, providing a forum for resolving legal conflicts.
2. Specialization: Tribunals are often specialized bodies that focus on specific areas of law or administration. They possess expertise and knowledge in their respective fields, allowing them to handle complex and technical matters more effectively.
3. Quasi-judicial Powers: Tribunals have quasi-judicial powers, meaning they can summon witnesses, examine evidence, and issue orders similar to a court of law. They have the authority to investigate and gather information relevant to the cases before them.
4. Alternative Dispute Resolution: In addition to traditional litigation, tribunals may employ alternative dispute resolution methods such as mediation or conciliation to encourage parties to reach a mutually acceptable resolution outside of a formal courtroom setting.
5. Administrative Decision-making: Some tribunals perform administrative functions, such as making decisions on regulatory matters, granting licenses or permits, and overseeing compliance with laws and regulations within their respective domains.
6. Review and Appeals: Tribunals may have the power to review and hear appeals against decisions made by lower-level tribunals or administrative authorities. They provide a mechanism for reviewing the correctness and legality of previous decisions.
7. Speedy Resolution: Tribunals aim to provide a more accessible and efficient means of resolving disputes compared to traditional courts. They are designed to expedite the adjudication process and deliver timely decisions.
8. Expertise and Specialized Knowledge: Tribunals often consist of members who possess specialized knowledge and expertise in the relevant fields. This enables them to better understand the technical aspects of the cases before them and make informed decisions based on their expertise.

By performing these functions, tribunals contribute to the efficient and effective administration of justice in specific areas of law, ensuring specialized resolution of disputes and easing the burden on the traditional court system.

Sharing is caring!